While the startup has won its “fair use” argument, it potentially faces billions of dollars in damages for allegedly pirating ...

Judges ruled this week that Anthropic and Meta could 'train' large language models on copyrighted books. But the larger war over AI developers' use of protected works is far from over.

Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot, judge rules.

A US federal judge ruled that using copyrighted books to train AI is fair use. Anthropic now faces trial over its use of pirated material.

Joanna Bryson, a professor of AI ethics at the Hertie School in Berlin, says the ruling is “absolutely not” a blanket win for tech companies. “First of all, it’s not the Supreme Court.

Instead, AI companies can spend $2.50 on an issue of The New York Times and upload it to their training database, Rosenberg explained, and meet their legal requirement.

Anthropic — founded by ex-OpenAI leaders in 2021 — has marketed itself as the more responsible and safety-focused developer of generative AI models that can compose emails, summarize documents ...

On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria seemed to do so reluctantly, calling ...

Judges ruled this week that Anthropic and Meta could 'train' large language models on copyrighted books. But the larger war ...

AI companies like OpenAI require tremendous amounts of data — text, images, video and more — to train their algorithms. (Getty Images) Instead, AI companies can spend $2.50 on an issue of The ...

“It’s a pretty big win actually for the future of AI training,” says Andres Guadamuz, an intellectual property expert at the University of Sussex who has closely followed AI copyright cases.