March 18 (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges can no longer avoid disclosing the value of travel-related gifts they receive by classifying such free trips as "reimbursements ...
Starbucks and some of its baristas have been in a contentious fight over unionizing since 2021. Now, the Supreme Court is ...
Supreme Court justices are divided along political lines over whether or not to explain their recusals, and legal experts are very concerned. Liberal justices are giving full disclosure about ...
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments this week with profound legal and political consequences. The high court will consider ...
The justices will hear Trump v. United States next week without the 45th president in attendance. The Stormy Daniels judge — ...
The ruling is on hold for 14 days, and voters will likely have a chance to weigh in on a ballot measure to enshrine abortion ...
The Supreme Court starts work on its October 2023 term on Tuesday with the "long conference," in which the justices will consider the backlog of petitions for certiorari that have been piling up ...
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts visited Duke University Thursday evening to speak at a private ceremony ...
The Supreme Court seemed skeptical of plaintiffs' arguments against the medical abortion drug mifepristone Tuesday, poking holes in the Texas physicians' claims that the court should revoke the ...
Following revelations that conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had not disclosed luxury trips paid for by a benefactor, U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must now ...
Authorities in Singapore said they charged two former officials of Sembcorp Marine on Thursday with handing bribes to Brazilian officials to advance the company's interests in the South American ...